Sunday, September 23, 2012

LV= outlines protection gender plans

LV= will switch its protection business to gender neutral rates on 1st December and is offering advisers a “G Day Guarantee” ahead of the gender directive, which comes into force on 21st December 2012.
The mutual reckons switching rates ahead of time offers certainty for advisers by allowing applications in the pipeline by 1st December to be processed on gender specific rates ahead of the deadline.
In addition, if by 1st December an application has further medical evidence outstanding, LV= will offer a “G Day Guarantee” to ensure the business can still be placed on gender specific rates.
The insurer will underwrite the application based on the medical information provided at application and if further medical evidence received is materially different to that given at application, the terms of the policy may be reviewed but cover will remain on gender specific rates.
To provide as much certainty as possible, policies will not be adjusted for small differences in medical disclosure.
However, LV= won’t apply the guarantee to female income protection business, as premiums are set to decrease under gender neutral pricing.
LV=’s head of protection, Mark Jones, says: “We’ve listened to adviser’s requests to provide a clear, simple and common sense approach to pipeline business.”

XL expands French operations

XL Group has opened a new office in Lyon with a team that will serve middle-market companies with annual turnover of €30 million to €300 million.
The insurer has appointed Auberi Etienne and Clotilde Bartok to respond to the needs of companies and broking houses across France’s south-east region.
Mr Etienne, who has been appointed senior casualty underwriter middle market, brings with him over 20 years of experience in the insurance industry.
He joined XL Group from Hiscox where for the past four years he has served as regional director for south-east France.
Ms Bartok joins XL Group as property underwriter middle market, having previously held the post of property underwriter with Generali for eight years, based in Lyon.
Kadidja Sinz, country manager of XL’s insurance operation in France, says: “Building on our established reputation of efficient underwriting, global capabilities and claims services, the opening of the new office in Lyon strengthens our presence in the French market and positions us well to serve our growing regional client base, especially those in the regions of Rhône Alpes and Provence-Alpes Côte d’Azur.”

Willis opens new Malta office

Willis Group Holdings plc has announced the establishment of a new office in Malta to serve the needs of its regional captive and commercial insurance clients.
The office, which was opened earlier this week, prompted Managing Director of Willis Management (Malta) Limited Nigel Goodlad to state that the firm was in an even better position to take its position on the island forward.
Chairman of the Willis Global Practice – International Malcolm Cutts Watson described Malta as an expanding financial service centre which enjoyed close links to numerous European hubs.
The new Maltese office follows the opening of a new office by Willis China in Harbin, which occurred in August of this year.

Ageas UK to acquire Groupama Insurance Company

Ageas has confirmed that it has signed an agreement to acquire Groupama Insurance Company Limited (GICL) for £116m (equating to around €145m).
The deal will see Ageas become the United Kingdom’s fifth largest Non-Life insurer, fourth largest Private Motor insurer and fourth largest Personal lines insurer.
The acquisition is seen as being a good strategic fit for Ageas, and also complements the firm’s multi-channel distribution approach.
The transaction excludes Groupama’s UK broking operations.
In 2011 GICL reported after-tax profits of £25.9m with a combined ratio of 97.8%.
The deal is subject to regulatory approval, and is anticipated to be be concluded before the end of the year.
Once the acquisition is complete GICL will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Ageas UK.
Ageas UK CEO Barry Smith said that the deal was a great strategic fit for the firm’s continuing development in the UK.

MMC CEO and president to retire

Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC) has announced that President and Chief Executive Officer Brian Duperreault is to step down at the end of the year.
Group President and Chief Operating Officer Daniel S. Glaser has been named as Duperreault’s successor, with effect from 1 January 2013.
Chairman of the Board of Directors Lord Lang of Monkton said that MMC was immensely grateful to Duperreault for the turn-around of the company that was achieved under his stewardship.
Lord Lang went on to say that there was no doubt that Duperreault left the firm in a stronger position than when he arrived.
Duperreault himself described serving as CEO and president as a privilege and said that he was proud of what had been accomplished.
He also expressed his full confidence in Glaser’s ability to capitalise upon MMC’s strengths and thanked the Board for its unwavering support.

Willis opens new Malta office

Willis Group Holdings plc has announced the establishment of a new office in Malta to serve the needs of its regional captive and commercial insurance clients.
The office, which was opened earlier this week, prompted Managing Director of Willis Management (Malta) Limited Nigel Goodlad to state that the firm was in an even better position to take its position on the island forward.
Chairman of the Willis Global Practice – International Malcolm Cutts Watson described Malta as an expanding financial service centre which enjoyed close links to numerous European hubs.
The new Maltese office follows the opening of a new office by Willis China in Harbin, which occurred in August of this year.

Careless driving to become fixed penalty offence

The Department for Transport has published a consultation paper which includes a proposal to make careless driving a fixed penalty offence and open to the offer of education training.
According to Transport Secretary, Mike Penning, with careless driving, the current enforcement process is time consuming and inefficient and the proposals will provide greater flexibility in dealing with low-level careless driving behaviours.
The paper also includes proposals to raise the level of many motoring fixed penalty notices from £60 to £90, although there are no proposals to make changes to penalty levels for parking restriction offences.

ABI calls for compensation culture reform

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) have found that three in four people have received an unsolicited call or text from a claims management company offering claims compensation services.
The ABI’s survey, which involved 2,600 respondents, discovered that 78% had been contacted by a Claims Management Company (CMC), with an even higher 82% of Londoners contacted.
However, the vast majority (92%) reported that the unsolicited call was not relevant to them and a strong majority (three in four) supported the idea of a crackdown on CMCs to reduce the widespread nature of fraudulent whiplash claims.
ABI Head of Motor and Liability James Dalton described the unsolicited calls as a symptom of the UK’s dysfunctional compensation system which encourages fictional, exaggerated or frivolous claims.
Dalton went on to say that the system’s losers were honest policyholders who suffered higher insurance premiums because of the actions of the dishonest.

RSA renews Clydesdale and Yorkshire Bank partnership

RSA renews Clydesdale and Yorkshire Bank partnership
Global insurer RSA has announced a five year renewal of its partnership with Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks.
As part of the reaffirmed deal, RSA will provide Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks with Home and Motor insurance.
Managing Director of Affinity at RSA Mark Allan said that the firm was proud to have renewed its partnership with Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks.
Allan went on to say that the insurer had a fantastic working relationship with the banks and that he looked forward to it continuing for many years to come.
Head of Insurance and Investments at Clydesdale and Yorkshire Banks Jeff Mendzil said that the banks were delighted to renew their home and motor insurance contracts with RSA.

RSA Czech operation enters run-off

RSA Czech operation enters run-off
Global insurer RSA has announced that it is to close its direct motor insurer in the Czech Republic, DIRECT Pojiš?ovna, to new business.
The existing portfolio of DIRECT Pojiš?ovna is to be placed into run-off with immediate effect.
Group Chief Executive Officer Simon Lee explained that the firm felt unable to achieve sustainable underwriting profit in the Czech Republic within a reasonable timeframe.
Lee went on to say that the firm had therefore decided to exit the market, but added that existing customers would not be impacted during the remainder of their policy term and emphasised that RSA remained committed to honouring the liabilities of its Czech operation until the run-off is completed.

Insurers and DVLA to develop points data check facility

UK insurers have agreed funding for a joint project with DVLA which will enable them to obtain accurate information about customers’ driving offences, including points and disqualifications.
The project, which has been under discussion for three years, will now be developed by DVLA and could be in place as early as 2014.
According to the Association of British Insurers (ABI), this is a major initiative in reducing fraud, which should save honest motorists money.
A detailed comparison exercise has already revealed that as many of 23% of motorists do not accurately declare their driving histories to insurers, including thousands of disqualified drivers who have bought insurance in an attempt to evade detection.
The system will work by drivers using their driving licence numbers when applying for insurance, following which automatic checks will be made on the DVLA database.
The ABI’s director of general insurance, Nick Starling, comments: “This is a significant step forward in the fight against insurance fraud.”
He adds: “Being able to access the DVLA database will not only root out fraud, but also make the process of applying for insurance faster, produce more accurate premiums, and reduce disputes in the event of claims.”

One in 10 young drivers never park

New research from The Co-operative Insurance has revealed that one in 10 young drivers have never actually parked their own car.
Ten percent of motorists aged 18-24 confessed that they got their mother or father to park their car for them, instead of doing it themselves.
Parking is a dreaded activity for younger drivers, the research reveals, with 27% lacking confidence when it comes to parking.
The biggest concern for young drivers, worrying 43%, is snow and ice on the roads, with unfamiliar roads concerning 30%.
Head of Motor Insurance at The Co-operative Grant Mitchell said that the findings showed that whilst young drivers had a reputation for overconfidence and recklessness a great many of them lack sufficient confidence.
Mitchell expressed surprise that basic issues such as parking and driving on roundabouts caused worry for new drivers.

Poor head restraints increase whiplash claims

Poor head restraints increase whiplash claims
AXA believes hundreds of thousands of whiplash claims could be prevented each year with better head restraints and seats in UK cars.
In a study carried out with motor research organisation, Thatcham, the insurer estimates that only 34% of cars on UK roads have head restraints and seats that would be categorised as “good” when it comes to reducing the risk of whiplash injury to the driver.
In addition, motorists and passengers are increasing the risk for themselves as only 39% of those surveyed ever adjusted their head restraint while 26% didn’t even know how to make an adjustment.
In the UK, 1,600 claims for whiplash are made per day, costing the insurance industry £2 billion per year in payouts.
According to AXA, if 65% of these could be avoided through better head restraints and seats, this could mean a reduction of 370,500 claims costing around £1.3 billion.
AXA’s tips on reducing whiplash risk include:
Make sure your head restraint is set at the right height for you; to be effective, a head restraint must be as close to the back of the head as possible (touching is best) and the top of the restraint should be as high as the top of the head.
If you have a very old or “spongy” restraint, look at replacing it or buying an add on pad.
Bring your seat to an upright position that will set the head restraint just behind your head.
Sometimes hats/hair accessories can make a head restraint feel uncomfortable but for safety the headwear should be removed rather than the head restraint pushed back.
If you are thinking of buying a new car, check out the Thatcham rating for the models you are considering.

ABI calls for updated Riot Act

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has warned that whilst insurers reacted rapidly to the rioting that engulfed London last year the riot compensation scheme has failed too many Londoners.
The most recent figures show that just over half the 3,487 claims made by Londoners for property damage compensation have been either rejected or discontinued.
The ABI is calling upon the Coalition Government to overhaul the Riot (Damages) Act 1886, under which the police are required to pay out compensation to those affected.
ABI Director of General Insurance Nick Starling said that overall insurance compensation for riot damage to homes, businesses and vehicles was expected to exceed £200m.
Starling went on to say that too many people who either lacked insurance at all or lacked sufficient coverage suffered unacceptable delays and bureaucracy when trying to collect the compensation to which they were entitled.
He urged the Government to update and review the Riot (Damages) Act 1886 so that it is fit for modern day London.

Ombudsman warning on legal expenses insurance


A YouGov survey commissioned by the UK’s legal ombudsman reveals that 74% of respondents didn’t know or were unsure what financial cover their legal expenses insurance provided, while 89% didn’t know or were unsure which legal services were excluded under the terms of the policy.
The findings have prompted the UK’s chief legal ombudsman, Adam Sampson, to warn consumers to be more vigilant following a series of cases in which customers were sold complex and confusing products that they often struggled to understand.
In his latest annual report, Mr Sampson refers to a series of case studies in which customers had brought their complaint to his organisation after losing money on unrealistic “no win, no fee” promises, dubious fixed-fee services and confusing legal insurance policies.
Having noted the damage done to the financial sector’s reputation by the mis-selling of complicated products such as Payment Protection Insurance, Mr Sampson warns that it could be disastrous if the legal sector was to follow suit.

RSA calls for updated eye test for drivers

RSA calls for updated eye test for drivers
Global insurer RSA has revealed there is a significant lack of awareness when it comes to minimum legal eyesight standards for car and motorbike users, with 90% unaware of what standards are required.
The UK driving test itself is somewhat outdated, relying upon a simple number plate test to ascertain whether or not a basic standard of vision has been met.
Furthermore, drivers are not asked about their eyesight again until they reach 70 years of age.
The number plate test was introduced in 1935, when cars were both far fewer and much slower than today.
Two thirds of those surveyed agreed that the number plate test was not suitable and more than half thought that an examination by a medical professional would be better.
In March of this year RSA UK & Western Europe Chief Executive Adrian Brown said that regular eye tests were as important as an MOT when it comes to driving in safety.

Parking spaces shrink as cars get longer

The average amount of space for parking in England’s residential areas has shrunk by 9% over the past decade, LV= research reveals.
Typically, since 2001, motorists have seen the space available for parking near home decrease by nearly a metre from 9.84 metres per car to 8.97 metres in 2011.
Meanwhile LV= estimates that the number of cars on the road grew by 15% during the decade, with space for residential parking failing to keep pace and cars typically becoming longer.
An analysis of 600 of the most popular UK models shows today’s new car stretching 4.3 metres on average, having put on 15 centimetres since 2001.
Unsurprisingly, London motorists are the most squeezed for parking – Westminster has the smallest amount of parking space at just 4.33 metres per car, average residential parking space in the borough having shrunk by 21% since 2001.
Outside the Capital, Harlow, Broxbourne, Slough, Watford and Stevenage have the least amount of resident parking space per vehicle.
John O’Roarke, managing director of LV= car insurance, comments: “Motorists are becoming increasingly squeezed when it comes to parking and in some areas the average space available is only a few centimetres longer than the average car.”

IFB success in identity fraud pilot


The Insurance Fraud Bureau (IFB) has reported that three suspected fraudsters have been arrested by the Metropolitan Police as a result of its involvement in one of the UK’s biggest investigations into identity fraud.
Working alongside the Metropolitan Police’s Amberhill Unit, the IFB has been investigating the insurance records of people suspected of having obtained a genuine driving licence using false or forged documents.
As part of the pilot project, the Bureau has focused on 579 suspected identity fraudsters across the UK and has already linked its sample of people to insurance claims now considered to be at “high-risk” of fraud.
In total the potential scams are worth in excess of £170,000 and alerts have been issued to insurers who may be affected.
The Bureau’s director, Phil Bird, comments: “IFB investigations on just a small sample of suspects have proved that these people are using their false identities to purchase insurance and make fraudulent claims.”

Aviva pilots pay-how-you-drive insurance

Aviva pilots pay-how-you-drive insurance
Aviva is proposing to use smartphone technology to create individual driver profiles that will be used to calculate tailored “pay-how-you-drive” premiums.
Aviva RateMyDrive, which is about to enter its next trial stage, monitors motorists for 200 miles, including acceleration, braking and cornering.
The data is then turned into an individual score which helps determine the motorist’s premium, with safer drivers earning a discount of up to 20%.
The insurer’s retail director, Steve Treloar, comments: “We believe this innovative use of smartphone technology will benefit all safe drivers, regardless of age or gender.”
He adds: “Unlike traditional ‘black box’ telematics solutions, Aviva RateMyDrive app only needs a small amount of data – typically 200 miles – to create an individual driver profile.”
The app is free to download and uses the customer’s own smartphone, so there is no need for motorists to have a black box installed in their car.
So far it has been tested by Aviva staff and the insurer is now looking for 5,000 motorist with android smartphones to complete its research.
Anyone interested in taking part can find out more by visiting the company’s website.

One millionth uninsured car is seized

The one millionth uninsured car on Britain’s roads has been seized by West Midlands police, Bluefin has reported.
The West Midlands force has been utilising automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) technology to help it crack down on the uninsured, and has reported an average seizure rate of one vehicle per hour.
Since 2005, when the police were first given the right to stop uninsured vehicles, forces across the UK have collectively seized 500 uninsured vehicles a day.
There is an estimated 1.2 million uninsured vehicles still on Britain’s roads, however.
A spokesman for the AA pointed out that whilst the fine for driving without insurance is roughly £200 the car insurance premium for a young driver can be as much as £3,000, explaining the high rate of both offending and reoffending.
Car insurance is not the only area subject to a lack of insurance, with The Co-operative Insurance last month revealing that 18% of British adults lack home insurance.

Motorists beware 1st September

Motorists beware 1st September
AXA is warning that the 1st September has been the worst day of the summer season for motor accidents for three years in a row.
Last year saw the biggest spike, with a massive 40% more claims being made than on the average day in the rest of the summer holiday period.
This year, 1st September falls on a Saturday and the insurer is predicting that figures may be even higher, as people return home at the end of holidays on the last Saturday of the school summer holidays.
Sarah Vaughan, AXA’s motor director says: “We are particularly concerned this year that the ‘bogey’ date of 1st September also falls on a Saturday which is traditionally a big ‘switchover’ day for holidaymakers.”
She adds: “We would urge all motorists to take special care driving home and plan their journey to eliminate the stresses that often cause needless accidents.”
Axa’s ten top tips for getting home safely are:
Leave plenty of time for your journey.
Plan your route.
Once you know your route use a traffic information provider to check that there are no major problems along the way.
Factor in a break if you are on a long journey.
Make sure you have games/DVDs at the ready to keep the kids occupied – bored children are a big distraction.
Keep snacks and drinks in the car – dehydration and low blood sugar are not good for anyone behind the wheel.
Carry out checks on your car before you leave – top up water, oil, tyres and petrol.
Check your breakdown cover and motor insurance is up to date and have the numbers readily available.
Set your phone to hands free before you set off.
If you can be flexible about when you leave, avoid 1st September!

LV=’s Britannia Rescue named top provider

LV=’s Britannia Rescue arm has been named the top recommended provider for breakdown cover by Which?
The consumer group rated providers on a number of factors including waiting times, quality of roadside repairs and customer satisfaction.
In all, 5,772 people who had called out a breakdown provider in the last year were surveyed and two types of cover were judged, third party cover and car manufacturer branded cover.
Britannia Rescue achieved an overall score of 73%, meaning it topped the third party cover table while also receiving a top score of 79% for customer satisfaction, equating to a five star rating from Which?
The firm’s managing director, Peter Horton, comments: “We pride ourselves on offering an excellent service to our customers so it is great to be recognised as a top scorer for customer satisfaction.”

Ageas ups anti fraud measures

Ageas has signed up to the Syndicated Intelligence for Risk Avoidance (SIRA) anti-fraud database from Synectics Solutions.
With application fraud on the rise – adding approximately £50 to customer premiums, according to Ageas – the insurer is deploying SIRA at the underwriting stage, checking information from new business proposal against known fraud data held by other financial organisations including insurers, banks and building societies.
SIRA also allows a claims team to identify third party claimants who have previously been involved in fraudulent activity with any SIRA member, through syndicated data sharing.
It will initially be used for Ageas’ motor customers, although the group has plans to launch SIRA for household and travel customers.
Commenting on the development, Ageas underwriting director, Adam Clarke, says: “The launch of SIRA will become an important part of our armory against those who intentionally attempt to commit fraud, validating risk data and rewarding honest customers.”

Car insurance premiums fall in September

Insurance comparison website Tiger.co.uk’s car insurance price monitor Tiger Watch has revealed that premiums in September declined by an average of 4% compared to the corresponding period last year.
Car insurance premiums are now the same as they were two years ago, with drivers between 35 and 55 seeing the largest falls, with quotes down by 9-18%.
Women drivers are also having a better month, after several months of rising premiums, and male drivers also saw their premiums decline.
Month-on-month female drivers saw a 4.7% price decrease, compared to just 1.1% for male drivers.
In March women had a 12.4% price advantage over male drivers, but the EU Gender Directive has seen this fall to 1.8% in September (although this is up from August when women had a 1.9% disadvantage).
Tiger.co.uk Commercial Director Andrew Goulborn explained that fierce competition was producing good news for motorists as prices continue to fall.

One in 14 car insurance claims are fraudulent

The record rise in motor insurance fraud is due to phantom passengers and fake injuries, according to the Association of British Insurers (ABI).
Each week 865 dishonest motor insurance claims worth £10.4m are being found by insurers.
The figures have been released a week after the ABI launched a new national database to help combat fraud – The Insurance Fraud Register.
Last year 45,000 motor insurance claims were fraudulent, and the savings made by detecting these fake claims totalled £541m.
Shockingly, one motor insurance claim in 14 (7%) is fraudulent.
Director of General Insurance Nick Starling warned would-be fraudsters that insurers would do whatever it took to weed out the cheats.
Starling went on to say that the new Insurance Fraud Register would enable insurers to check for fraudsters, and those found guilty of it would find getting insurance more difficult and more expensive.

Aviva archives reveal archaic insurance claims

Aviva archives reveal archaic insurance claims
Car insurer Aviva’s archives, dating back to 1911 when there were just 89,000 cars on the road, have revealed historic and unusual reasons for insurance claims in decades past.
Despite the lower number of cars accidents were more common in the past, with one accident per 14 vehicles in 1930, compared to one accident per 222 vehicles today.
Back in 1911 horses outnumbered cars by 36 to one, with one farmer claiming his horse died of shock when it saw a car.
Half a century ago in 1953 a ram took umbrage at a well-polished van, when it mistook its reflection for a rival and rammed the previously pristine vehicle.
In an overseas claim in 1955, a lion found its way into the back of a car and fell asleep, only to be woken when the driver started the car, which led the lion to tear up the interior.
The novelty of motoring could also lead to problems, as a claim in 1938 originated when a man struck a match in order to investigate a petrol leak.
Whilst today claims are proportionally less common fraud is an increasing issue, with ABI figures revealing that 2011 saw 45,000 motor insurance claims that were fraudulent.

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Insurance Experts: Colo. Road Rage Court Decision a Unique Case



Insurance experts say that a Colorado appeals court decision handed down earlier this year highlights a situation that members in the auto insurance seldom see: policyholders seeking compensation for a road rage incident that took place outside of any vehicle.
The case was brought by Chanson Roque and Shannon Isenhour against their own insurer. Roque and Isenhour had been injured by Richard Terlingen, who struck the two with a golf club after initially arguing with them while driving.
After the argument on the road, the three ended up in a McDonald’s parking lot, where Terlingen blocked in the other two by parking his car directly behind their cars and then proceeded to assault them with the golf club, according to court documents.
After unsuccessfully filing a claim with Terlingen’s insurer for their injuries, Roque and Isenhour sought damages in court from their own insurance provider, Allstate. They claimed that since Terlingen’s own insurer wouldn’t cover the damages, he was technically an uninsured motorist and that their injuries should be covered under their Allstate uninsured motorist policy.
Allstate made the same argument that Terlingen’s insurer had made: if the incident took place outside of the car, it shouldn’t be covered by auto insurance. That logic eventually won out.
Kelly Campbell, regional manager in Colorado for the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America (PCI), said road rage-related cases are “pretty unique” for insurance companies, but they do make their way to court every couple years.
“When you look at all the claims and accidents that insurers see, you’ll typically see rear-ending and similar incidents,” she said. “But these [road rage incidents] are very unique situations.”
Bob Passmore, PCI senior director of personal lines, said that he hasn’t personally dealt with such a case in his two decades’ worth of experience with insurance claims.
“I’ve worked in claims for 22 years and in 13 states in the Midwest, and I’ve heard of [road rage claims] but never had one pass my desk,” he said. “But whenever they happen, they tend to wind up in the news or in headlines.”
Preceding Cases Helped Direct Court Decision
Campbell said road rage-related claims seldom show up in courts, with the last major Colorado ruling occurring in 2003 and involving a woman seeking compensation from State Farm. The woman, who was kidnapped and sexually assaulted in her own vehicle, claimed that she should get Colorado car insurance compensation from her coverage because the vehicle was involved in her injuries, but the court disagreed, saying the vehicle was not directly used in causing her injuries.
Campbell said that such situations end up in court when insurers and policyholders butt heads over insurance policy language.
“Generally speaking, when you’re looking at policy language that falls in the gray area about whether something is covered or not, it becomes a legal question,” she said. “Those are the types of situations that may lend themselves to legal action.”
One of the major questions that the court addressed in the Allstate case was whether or not trapping a vehicle with another vehicle to carry out an assault created a “causal connection” between the vehicle and ensuing injuries.
In the Allstate case, the state court relied heavily on the 2003 ruling to formulate its argument that Roque and Isenhour were not due compensation for the road rage incident. But the court also referred to other similar court decisions involving a car aiding in the carrying out of an assault; most of those rulings occurred in the 1990s and 1980s.
In those cases, using a car to “block another’s escape before leaving [the] car to commit assault” did not constitute enough of a direct link between the car and the assault to justify compensation under insurance coverage, according to the court ruling.
An appeal to the ruling, which would bring the case to the state Supreme Court for further consideration, hasn’t been filed, but Campbell said that she did not expect an appeal to be considered by the state’s highest court.
“The Supreme Court already addressed the issue in the Kastner case,” she said, referring to the 2003 ruling. “Every 10 years or so this issue has popped up, but the court gave a pretty clear ruling in the Kastner case, so I don’t think it would feel the need to address it again.”

In Mass., $345,000 to be Repaid for Wrongful Policy Terminations


Massachusetts drivers with clean records who had their policies unfairly terminated by Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Met P&C) will see restitution for having to switch insurers following an investigation by the state attorney general’s office (AGO).
The insurer will pay about $400,000 total resulting from the AGO’s 2010 investigation into 2,600 policies that the insurer refused to renew. The policies belonged to drivers who had clean records for the previous three years. Under the state’s “clean-in-three” rule—which only applied to policies before April 2011—insurers were prohibited from terminating policies of motorists whose records had no traffic violations or accidents in the past three years.
It is the first case of its kind that the AGO has encountered, according to spokeswoman Jillian Fennimore.
About 2,500 policyholders who were non-renewed will receive $310,000 in restitution payments—an average of $124 per policyholder. Those consumers were forced to look for coverage elsewhere and did end up finding policies from other insurers.
Met P&C will also pay $35,000 to 56 policyholders who were terminated and put in the state’sMassachusetts Automobile Insurance Plan (MAIP), bringing the average payment in that group to $625. MAIP is a last-ditch option for motorists unable to get Massachusetts car insurance from willing insurers in the voluntary market. MAIP’s high-risk policies are typically pricier than those that could be found on the voluntary market.
Fennimore said the restitution amounts were generally based on the cost of changing insurers.
Met P&C will also pay the state $50,000 and “has agreed that it will follow CAR rules and Massachusetts statutes and regulations in the future when renewing and non-renewing” auto coverage policies.
Met P&C is a subsidiary of MetLife of New York. The insurer complied with investigators throughout the case and will continue to provide documents to the AGO as evidence they are adhering to state law, according to the AGO.

HLDI Claims Study: Pricey Cars Make for Pricey Claims


Injury claims are most likely to come from occupants of minicars and cars equipped with powerful engines while luxury vehicles lead to the priciest vehicle repair claims, according to the latest insurance claims data released Thursday from the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI).
Ferrari California Cost Insurers the Most
Ferrari CaliforniaThe Ferrari California showed the highest overall collision losses among all 2009-11 models. That’s despite the fact that about only 1 in 38 owners of Ferrari Californias will file a collision claim in a given year, according to the HLDI data. Insured Ferrari Californias ended up costing coverage providers an average of $2,132 each, which was more than seven times the average for all vehicles.
The average Ferrari California collision claim size reflected the car’s large price tag, coming in at a whopping $82,112—that’s nearly 20 times the average claim size for all vehicles.
“Naturally, expensive cars cost more to fix, which is why they have such high collision losses,” HLDI senior vice president Kim Hazelbaker said in a statement.
The lowest overall collision losses belonged to the Chevrolet Tahoe hybrid. That model cost insurers an average of $134 per insured Tahoe. Owners of the Chevy hybrid filed claims at a rate that was about average. In a given year, 1 in 15 Tahoe owners filed a collision claim. The reason the Tahoe ended up costing insurers so little was that the average collision claim size for that model was only $2,019—less than half the average claim size for all vehicles.
Claim-Prone Mitsubishi Lancer an Outlier
For 2009-11 vehicles costing under $30,000, the Mitsubishi Lancer 4WD had the worst record with coverage providers, costing insurance companies $707 per insured Lancer—2.5 times above the average. The data show that in a given year about 1 in 9 Lancer owners will file a collision claim, which end up coming in at about $6,220 each on average.
The Lancer’s “high relative losses make it an outlier among small four-door cars,” according to the report. “The Lancer is a small sporty sedan, and its powerful engine and fun-to-drive image attract drivers who like to go fast.”
At the other end of the spectrum, the two-door Jeep Wrangler 4WD ended up being the under-$30,000 vehicle that cost insurers the least. Insurers lost an average of $134 per insured Wrangler. About 1 in 35 Wrangler owners will file a collision claim in a given year. The average claim size was $4,862.
SUVs and pickups comprised many of the models on the list of least costly collision claims, although they ended up having pricier property damage liability claims, an informative note for car shoppers comparing insurance costs and looking to save on their premiums.
Yaris Has Highest Injury Claims; Porsche 911 Has Lowest
The report also looked at personal injury protection (PIP) coverage losses that it said reflects “in part how well a vehicle protects its occupants,” finding that the Toyota Yaris had the highest frequency of injury claims, coming in at about twice the average with 28.5 claims per 1,000 insured vehicle years. Most PIP claims came from minicars like the Yaris or small cars in general. The Porsche 911 had the best record and was joined by a handful of large pickups and SUVs with similar records.
“We know that in the real world, if all else is equal, a larger, heavier vehicle does a better job protecting occupants than a smaller, lighter one,” the report stated. “These claim frequencies demonstrate that clearly.”
Claims data can also illuminate aspects of car safety that crash test ratings fail to because results from those tests “are comparable only among similar vehicles,” according to the report.
“Insurance data reflect a much wider variety of crash severities and make it possible to compare vehicles of different types in a way that can’t be done with crash test information,” the report stated.
HLDI Publicizes Claims Data Availability
The HLDI’s annual research into vehicle claims data has been published in a nationally distributed “Relative Collision Insurance Cost Information” booklet distributed by auto dealers around the U.S. But this summer, the U.S. House of Representatives approved legislation repealing the requirement, which dealers believed had become “an unnecessary hassle” that shoppers rarely requested; the bill now awaits action in the Senate.
The contents of the booklet, which the HLDI says allows consumers to “compare models on the basis of their susceptibility to damage and to show how the choice of a vehicle can affect insurance premiums,” is still available online, Hazelbaker said.

The Hartford, MIT List Top 10 Car Safety Technologies




The elderly may have a tougher time driving as they age, but getting behind the wheel may be safer thanks to technologies that will require them to do less of that driving themselves.
A new list from The Hartford and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) highlights the top 10 car technologies that help older drivers on the road, and many of those technologies are warning and assist systems promoting safe driving and awareness.
The list, assembled by an expert group including professionals from fields including geriatrics and ergonomics, focused on useful devices that could aid mature drivers who were 50 years of age and older:
–smart headlights
–emergency response systems
–reverse-monitoring systems
–blind-spot warning systems
–lane departure warning systems
–vehicle stability control
–parking assist systems
–voice-activated systems
–crash-mitigation systems
–drowsy driver alerts
In addition to compiling the list, MIT’s AgeLab released research findings showing 65 percent of older drivers report that having the latest technologies increases their confidence.
Also, 1 in 4 older drivers say that their foremost concern is their vision during nighttime driving.
That common problem makes smart headlights one of the list’s most useful tools, according to Jodi Olshevski, a gerontologist with The Hartford. Such headlights come equipped with camera-like technology in the front of a vehicle that automatically adjusts the intensity and range of the beam based on oncoming traffic.
“It actually helps you not only see better, but it also reduces glare,” Olshevski said in a video guide released with the list.
The blind-spot warning system, which alerts motorists to any objects entering their blind spots, is especially helpful to older drivers who have reduced range of motion and reaction time, Olshevski said.
“It’s like I have a co-pilot with me,” said Joan Callahan, a new car owner who was featured in the video, about the warning system.
Callahan added that some technologies will take some getting used to, including the reverse-monitoring system that provides an in-dashboard video feed of what is behind the vehicle.
Olshevski said practice makes perfect with such technologies.
“It’s true that a lot of this technology does take some getting used to,” she said. “Once drivers get comfortable and they actually adjust their driving style to make space for these new features, it can really become second nature.
And with that comes a new level of confidence, which all of us can benefit from as we age.”
Facing Greater Risk, Older Drivers Have Insurance Decisions to Make
Coverage rates tick upward for drivers as they enter old age because older drivers present greater risk for insurers to cover.
Based on miles traveled, fatality rates rise beginning at 75 years old before seeing a significant jump after 80 years old, though “fragility begins to increase” between the ages of 60 and 64,according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported that, in 2009, older drivers accounted for 16 percent of all traffic fatalities, 15 percent of vehicle occupant fatalities and 19 percent of pedestrian fatalities.
But older drivers may still be able to find a cheap insurer to provide them affordable coverage.
Overall, crash rates tend to go down as drivers age. And as of August 2011, 31 states and the District of Columbia require insurance premium discounts for drivers 55 years old and over after they’ve completed eligible accident prevention courses, according to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.
Alabama just made it easier for seniors to obtain that insurance discount, too. Recent revisions to the state’s motor vehicle code reduced the number of instruction hours a driver needs to get reduced premiums from eight to six. Another change made online course participants eligible for the discount.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Pros and cons of buying a used car


Determine whether a used car is right for you

Used vehicles are often the best values you'll find in the automotive market. This is especially so for late-model ones. Not only is the price lower than a comparable new car, but ownership expenses such as collision insurance and taxes are lower, and a used vehicle has already taken its biggest hit in depreciation. In addition, buying used is often a way to get a better-equipped vehicle than you'd be able to afford new.
But buying a used vehicle is an exercise in finding the right balance of value and risk. Following are some issues to consider.

Reliability

One thing that has made used cars more appealing is their improved reliability. In a analysis ofConsumer Reports annual subscriber surveys over the past few years, we found that five-year-old vehicles in the latest survey had one-third fewer problems than the five-year-old vehicles we looked at in 2005. Years ago, rust and exhaust-system problems were common, but that's no longer the case. As a result, buying a late-model used vehicle is not as much of a risk as it used to be. When properly maintained, today's vehicles should easily go well past 100,000 miles, and many could reach 200,000 miles without a major breakdown.

Warranties and repairs

Although used cars are more reliable than ever, maintenance and repair costs are important considerations.
In the first two or three years of a car's life, it has fewer problems and is typically covered by a comprehensive warranty. A used car, on the other hand, is either close to coming off warranty or already off it. You can expect not only more problems as time goes on, but more costly ones as the years pile up.
This means that owners will have to pay for repairs out of pocket, but most costs will probably go to replace parts like tires, brakes, or a battery—high-wear items that often aren't covered by a warranty anyway. The expense of replacing all of them, if necessary, would still be relatively modest considering the overall savings from buying a used vehicle.
There is always the risk that you'll buy a lemon. Even a car with a great reliability history can be a risky proposition if it was abused by a previous owner or if previous damage has been hidden. By giving the car a careful inspection yourself and having the vehicle thoroughly inspected by a qualified mechanic, you can usually get a good idea of the car's value.

Depreciation

A major disadvantage to buying a new car is the rapid depreciation it undergoes in the first few years. Models typically lose about 47 percent of their value in the first three years, compared with 18 percent over the next three. But this varies greatly among models. The 2007 BMW 3 Series, for example, has held its value relatively well (about 30 percent depreciation over the first three years), while the 2007 Lincoln Town Car has depreciated rapidly (about 60 percent).
Several factors determine depreciation, including the model's popularity, perceived quality, supply, and whether or not the vehicle is of the current design. The average depreciation on a $27,500 vehicle leaves less than $15,000 after three years, a huge hit in residual value.

Interest rates

Loans for new cars typically have a lower interest rate, but the difference is often not a major concern. In March 2010 the rates for a 36-month new-car loan was about 6.7 percent, according to Bankrate.com; a 36-month used-car loan was about 7. 1 percent. These two rates are often within just one percentage point of each other, and the additional interest you pay on a used-car loan adds only about $7 to $15 on a monthly loan payment.

Insurance

You'll typically pay less to insure a used vehicle than a new version of the same vehicle. Insurer USAA quoted a New York policyholder with a good driving record $441 for a six-month policy on a three-year old Honda CR-V EX and $483 for a new CR-V, which would equal $84 in annual savings.

Safety

Buying a used car means you won't have the latest safety features. Newer features such as electronic stability control (ESC), head-protecting curtain air bags, and advanced frontal air-bag systems are harder to find on older vehicles. But safety features such as antilock brakes, traction control, and side air bags have been commonplace for quite a few years now. LATCH child-seat anchors have been mandated since 2002 and top-tethers since the 1999 model year.
If you can accept a reliable vehicle that is in less-than-mint condition and you're willing to pay for maintenance and repair costs, your dollars will go further when buying a used car rather than a new one.

Car Buying Advice

Step-by-step: Buying a new car


A guide to car insurance

Many people stick with the same insurance carrier year after year without ever shopping for a better deal. Blind loyalty to one insurer can cost you dearly. In a recent survey, Consumer Reports found that some drivers were paying twice as much for a policy than they would have with another insurer.

FINDING THE BEST RATES

Comparing premiums is easier than ever, thanks to online services such as Quicken Insurance (www.quicken.com/insurance) and InsWeb (www.insweb.com). While you can also use the Yellow Pages to canvass local insurance agents for quotes, online services let you compare multiple price quotes in minutes.

You should make this price comparison at least once a year. Still, it may not be a good idea to switch companies too often or arbitrarily. Sometimes loyalty pays. For instance, if you've been with one company several years and maintained a clean driving record, you may qualify for a safe-driver discount, which substantially lowers your premium. But if you're contemplating a switch, the new company may be willing to classify you as a safe driver. In addition, you can often get a discount for insuring more than one vehicle--or your home--with the same company.

To get an accurate quote, you'll need to provide information on the car or cars that you intend to insure: the make, model, year, trim line, and the vehicle identification number (VIN). You'll also need to give the age, sex, and recent driving record of all potential drivers. Some companies may also ask where you normally park your car, and inquire about any aftermarket accessories you may have installed to prevent theft. The insurer may independently check your driving history using public documents such as police records, and your insurance history through your current and former insurers.


BUY THE RIGHT AMOUNT

Car insurance is meant to protect you against catastrophic losses, such as a major accident or the theft of your car. Be prepared to absorb minor losses yourself, and you'll save a lot. Here are tips on separating the essentials from coverage you can probably live without.

Coverage you must have

Bodily injury liability. Should you cause an accident, the "liability" part of your insurance coverage pays the medical, rehabilitation, and, if necessary, funeral bills of your passengers, the other driver, his or her passengers, and any pedestrians involved. It also covers pain and suffering awards as well as legal costs.

Buy coverage that will pay at least $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident. If you have sizable assets, consider increasing those limits to $250,000 per person and $500,000 per accident. Such added coverage will raise your premium at least 10 percent. We recommend that people with a high net worth have a separate "umbrella" policy to insure against a lawsuit seeking an amount beyond their auto policy's limits. You may need to buy higher insurance limits to qualify for an umbrella policy.

Property damage. This coverage pays to repair or replace another person's vehicle or other property damaged by your car. States typically require only $10,000 to $25,000. We suggest buying coverage of $100,000.

Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage. This covers medical bills, rehabilitation, and funeral costs, as well as losses for pain and suffering for you or the passengers in your car when an accident is caused by a hit-and-run driver or someone who has little or no insurance. Get the same amount of this coverage as you do bodily injury coverage. That way, if someone who has no insurance hits you, your medical costs will be covered.

Coverage you'll probably need

Collision and comprehensive. Collision coverage pays to repair or replace your car no matter who or what caused the accident. Comprehensive pays to repair or replace your car if it's stolen or damaged as a result of a storm or other natural event. Coverage kicks in for the amount above your deductible. Choose the highest deductible you can afford to pay out of pocket--at least $500. Once the cost of this coverage equals 10 percent of your vehicle's book value, you might want to cancel it, since you will collect no more than your vehicle's market worth. Antique vehicles or cars with collector value sometimes are insured through a separate rider; or you may have to find a separate, specialty insurer.

Personal-injury protection. PIP reimburses you for lost wages and in-home care needed as a result of an accident. If you have separate health and disability policies, you can buy just the state-required minimum for PIP. The other policies should cover the balance of your needs.

Medical-payments coverage. Sometimes called med-pay, this covers medical bills for you and your passengers, regardless of who's at fault. When this coverage isn't automatically included in your policy, its costs are minimal. You may not require any if you have good health insurance. To protect passengers who may not have their own health coverage, you may want to carry at least $5,000 of this coverage.

Additional types of coverage

Roadside assistance. This coverage pays to have your vehicle towed. If you already have an auto-club membership or your car's manufacturer provides this service for free, don't buy this extra coverage.

Rental reimbursement. This coverage typically costs $30 per year and pays for a rental car--usually for up to 30 days--if your vehicle is stolen or is in the shop for repairs sustained in an accident. There's usually a cap on the amount you're reimbursed per day and per occurrence.


MONEY-SAVING TIPS

Ask for the top tier. Insurers sort customers according to their likelihood of filing a claim, then assign them to one of several categories commonly referred to as tiers. Top-tier customers who have had few or no claims in the past several years and live in neighborhoods where auto-theft rates are low, for example, can easily save 15 percent or more off the standard rate. But simply because you qualify initially or improve your driving record doesn't mean you automatically get top-tier status.

Check rates before you buy a car. The difference in premiums between one car or truck and another can be substantial. Much of that has to do with the cost of repairing collision damage, which can vary greatly even among seemingly similar vehicles.

Get equipment discounts. You may qualify for extra discounts if your car has current safety equipment such as air bags or antilock brakes. Also check about anti-theft equipment such as an alarm system, which can get you a break on the comprehensive part of your coverage.

Group your policies. Most insurers will give you a multiple-policy price break if you let them write your auto, home, and personal-liability coverage.

Improve your driving skills. Completing a certified defensive-driving course can reduce your premium in some states.

Kid factors. If you have children who drive, you'll save if they get good grades or if they attend a school located more than 100 miles from your home and don't use the car there.

Group discounts. Insurers award discounts to low-risk consumers who share a common affiliation such as a membership in an employee group, a company pension fund, or an alumni association. These so-called affinity discounts can be sizable, so if they apply to you, it pays to take advantage of them. Ask your insurer if any groups to which you belong qualify for such a discount. Alternatively, ask representatives of the groups if they work with any insurance companies.

Keep repair options open. Some insurers insist you use generic replacement parts or encourage you to bring your vehicle to certain body shops in an effort to cut claims costs. While this arrangement may lower your premium, you may want to preserve your flexibility by insuring with a company that lets you decide which parts are used (original equipment or aftermarket copies), and who does the repairs. In tests a few years ago, we found none of the aftermarket replacement bumpers tested fit as well as factory-original bumpers or stood up as well to low-speed impacts. We also had trouble making generic fenders fit properly.

Confessions of an Auto Claims Adjuster


When you want to get a little more for your car, you can't be nice. The adjuster knows what he can do, he's done it a hundred times before and he won't hesitate to do it again to close that file. But to you, the individual, it's a brand-new thing. And it's money in your pocket.
After my friends get in a car accident, they come to me to ask how to deal with the claims adjuster. Recently, I helped a friend who had totaled her Mini Cooper and she got $1,500 more than what the insurance company first offered her.
You have to know the business and understand the role of the auto claims adjuster and then you can negotiate effectively on your own behalf. It's not that the insurance companies are trying to cheat their clients. Actually, they want you to be happy. But they are in a hurry, with lots of open cases, and don't have the time or inclination to thoroughly research your case.
The Life of an Auto Claims Adjuster
I spent four years as a claims adjuster for a nationally known insurance company, and my specialty was dealing with total loss claims as well as theft vehicles that weren't recovered. So it was my job to determine the value of the vehicle, present this to the customer and convince them to accept it.
Being a claims adjuster is probably one of the most stressful jobs. I actually lasted longer than most people. If you have a low tolerance for people yelling at you, you won't last long. There were times when my office had bomb threats and even times when I was confronted physically.
My caseload was about 150 open cases. Just think of keeping up to date and knowledgeable about all 150 cases and the high volume of telephone calls that goes with it. In addition, you are meeting people face to face under circumstances which aren't always pleasant.
I also had an extremely high volume of calls, probably 60 calls going out and 50 calls coming in each day. The calls came in so fast that if you picked up the phone there might be someone on the line before it rang. That happened three or four times a day.
How the Claims Process Works
I worked the back end of the claim. I got the file after liability had been settled, so they knew who was at fault. It was my job to decide how much to pay the person for their car or to decide if the vehicle was repairable.
Auto claims adjusters love it when a customer is happy with what they offer. For example, if Mrs. Smith is happy with the amount we give her, she signs the paperwork and we're done. But in most cases, they aren't happy. People get too attached to their cars, and they think the car is worth more than it really is. People might not have gotten a car in four or five years, and they don't realize the car has depreciated considerably. That is where the big disputes come in.
When the customer disputes the claim, the adjuster will explain how they got their figure. Basically, they have prepared what is called an evaluation report that uses two to three similar vehicles ("comparables") as pricing references, but it can use a dozen or more.
Get More Money for Your Car
If you are offered $15,000 and you just tell them you want $18,000, they aren't going to give it to you. You have to come up with a reason for them to give you that much. Every adjuster has a little flexibility, and they know that not everything will go through easily. So they usually have an extra $500 to settle a case.
The best way to get more money out of an auto claims adjuster is to challenge the evaluation report. Take a look at the vehicles they used as comparables. A fair market value is determined by taking the average of the comparable vehicles. The key word there is average — it only takes two vehicles to make an average. So if you have two cars worth $20,000 but the six others are worth $14,000 you can ask your adjuster, "Here are two cars that are just like mine, so can you base your evaluation report on those?"
Another tip is to ask the adjuster to reduce the number of comparables. You can ask him just to use the top five vehicles and that might be enough to bring the price up quite a bit. Believe it or not, a lot of people don't do that. But the smart ones do. When someone did that to me, it made me wonder if they had talked to some other adjuster who had coached them.
If you have a classic car, 90 percent of the time the insurance company will not evaluate your car correctly. Say you have a 1980 Pontiac Trans Am, the old Smokey and the Bandit car. I could see an evaluation report coming back at $4,500. But in all honesty, that car, in pristine condition, is worth about $25,000. If you know that, get ready for a lowball offer and find your own comparable vehicles to get your price to where it deserves to be.
Another thing that consumers don't realize is that in some states, you have the right to hire an independent appraiser. This could be a good move depending on the cost. But if you have a 2004 Camry, there isn't much to be gained if the independent service costs $400.
Be Prepared for Pushback
If a customer challenged me, I had a few lines I would always use. I'd start by saying something like, "I think our appraisal looks good. I'm sorry it doesn't satisfy what you think it's worth." But then, if they still didn't agree, I would say, "Here's what I can do. I can go up another $500 if you are willing to settle." And sometimes that worked.
Just remember, the auto claims adjuster wants to settle your claim. They have a heavy caseload, and they are looking to close 40 cases a month. So there is always about a $500 window where they can settle a claim immediately. If a claimant pushes for more money, it might take longer to get approval while the adjuster gets a signature from their supervisor.
When Your Car Is "Totaled"
If the repairs to your vehicle were less than 50 percent of the car's value, we fixed it. (Note: This percentage varies by state.) But what if the customer had a car that was worth less? If they went to sell it and the buyer found it was in an accident, they would reduce their offer or refuse to buy it. This is called "diminished value" and the insurance company won't pay for this loss of value.
So if you are close to the 50 percent threshold, you can argue with the adjuster to just "total it out." That way, you get a check that you can put toward the purchase of your next car, rather than getting your old car back.
Tell the adjuster, "There might be some hidden damage to the car that you didn't find. It could have damage to the unibody frame or the rails or maybe something is going to go wrong with the air-conditioning. Therefore, can you please total out the car?" Sometimes, this will persuade them since they know you're right.
Avoiding the "Preferred" Repair Shops
You should also be prepared for the auto claims adjuster to try to steer you toward their preferred body shop. We would tell our clients, "We would like to help you get your vehicle repaired and we do have a list of preferred shops that we would like for you to use. They are all certified and do top-of-the-line work."
My recommendation is to ignore this offer and go with the shop you want. If possible, take your car to a shop that specializes in your make of car. If you have a fairly new car, like a 2007 Honda Accord, take it to a Honda body shop. I can tell you right now our preferred shops, once a month, came around and bought us lunch and gave us little gifts to get us to push business their way. If the vehicle was going to be repaired we would push people toward one of our shops.
Looking Back
Being an auto claims adjuster took a toll on me. I'd say it changed my view of human nature. It opened my eyes to the fact that some people are honest but some people are just trying to get as much as they can.
But it's also important to be ready to negotiate and stand up for yourself. I remember I offered this one guy a settlement, and he accepted it right off the bat. He said he was a religious man and respected what I did and assumed I was being honest. It almost made me feel bad. I wanted to say, "Wait! Wait! Don't you want to negotiate?" But being a good claims adjuster, I would never do that. So just remember, it's your car, you paid all those premiums, and you deserve whatever your car is really worth.